<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology)</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology)</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Экология человека</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1728-0869</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2949-1444</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">655823</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/humeco655823</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">QWQJYX</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL STUDY ARTICLES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Joint cognitive task strategies in participant dyads with different personality profiles</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Стратегии совместной когнитивной деятельности в диадах испытуемых с разными индивидуально-типологическими характеристиками</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title>具有不同个体类型特征的受试者二人组中协同认知活动的策略</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4243-8727</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4445-4178</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Murtazina</surname><given-names>Elena P.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Муртазина</surname><given-names>Елена Павловна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname>Murtazina</surname><given-names>Elena P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine); Associate Professor</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук, доцент</p></bio><bio xml:lang="zh"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine); Associate Professor</p></bio><email>murtazina_ep@academpharm.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4860-6151</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4609-3885</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ermakova</surname><given-names>Olga I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ермакова</surname><given-names>Ольга Игоревна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname>Ermakova</surname><given-names>Olga I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>ermakova_oi@academpharm.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5530-4990</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">3876-0513</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pertsov</surname><given-names>Sergey S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Перцов</surname><given-names>Сергей Сергеевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname>Pertsov</surname><given-names>Sergey S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the RAS</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук, профессор, чл.-корр. РАН</p></bio><bio xml:lang="zh"><p>MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the RAS</p></bio><email>pertsov_ss@academpharm.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Федеральный исследовательский центр оригинальных и перспективных биомедицинских и фармацевтических технологий</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="zh">Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-07-19" publication-format="electronic"><day>19</day><month>07</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><issue-title xml:lang="zh"/><fpage>20</fpage><lpage>31</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-02-12"><day>12</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-04-04"><day>04</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2025,</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hum-ecol.ru/1728-0869/article/view/655823">https://hum-ecol.ru/1728-0869/article/view/655823</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>BACKGROUND:</bold> A current issue in social psychophysiology is the investigation of strategies for achieving outcomes in team activities and the factors influencing their selection across various professional domains.</p> <p><bold>AIM:</bold> To identify strategies for achieving joint cognitive task outcomes in dyads of subjects with different personality traits and individual performance indicators.</p> <p><bold>METHODS:</bold> 52 male dyads and 50 female dyads (mean age: 17 years 9 months ± 3 months, dyad members were acquainted with each other) were examined after providing voluntary informed consent. Personality traits were assessed using the Big Five questionnaire. Participants performed the Pattern Recognition test individually, competitively, and cooperatively in dyads.</p> <p><bold>RESULTS:</bold> Joint and separate cooperation strategies were identified, characterized by comparable levels of integral success and similar distribution across the entire sample and within male and female dyad groups. Performance indicators under the two strategies differed in timing and error rates. Compared to the joint strategy, the separate strategy resulted in faster completion and identification of more patterns, but with more errors. Dyads employing the joint strategy demonstrated higher individual error rates, greater error differences between partners, and more similar work pace, compared with those who later adopted the separate strategy. Dyad participants with a joint cooperation strategy exhibited higher baseline levels of the personality traits “agreeableness” and “relaxedness,” and a lower level of activity compared with participants who adopted a separate strategy.</p> <p><bold>CONCLUSION:</bold> The findings contribute to the understanding of strategic choices in team-based intellectual activity and their association with individual partner characteristics. These patterns may serve as a basis for developing methods to select collaborators for achieving integrated results in various fields of activity.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Обоснование. </bold>Актуальной проблемой социальной психофизиологии является изучение стратегий достижения результатов командной деятельности и факторов, определяющих их выбор, в различных профессиональных сферах.</p> <p><bold>Цель.</bold> Выявить стратегии достижения совместного результата когнитивной деятельности в диадах у испытуемых с различными личностными характеристиками и показателями персональной результативности.</p> <p><bold>Материалы и методы.</bold> Обследованы 52 пары мужчин и 50 пар женщин (средний возраст — 17 лет 9 мес. ± 3 мес., знакомые друг с другом в диадах), давших добровольное, информированное согласие. Личностные характеристики определяли по методике «Большая пятёрка». Участники выполняли тест «Установление закономерностей» индивидуально, соревнуясь и кооперативно в диадах.</p> <p><bold>Результаты.</bold> Выявлены совместная и раздельная стратегии кооперации, с сопоставимыми значениями интегральной успешности и одинаковым распределением по всей выборке и в группах диад мужчин и женщин. Показатели кооперативной деятельности диад с разными стратегиями отличались по временны́м характеристикам и ошибочностью. При раздельной стратегии, по сравнению с совместной, пары быстрее проходили тест, отмечая большее число закономерностей, но с большим числом ошибок. Для испытуемых с совместной стратегией кооперации были характерны более высокие уровни индивидуальной ошибочности, их разниц между партнёрами и сходство темпа деятельности по сравнению с участниками пар, выбравших в последующем раздельную стратегию. У испытуемых пар с совместной стратегией были выше уровни исходных личностных характеристик «понимание» и «расслабленность» и ниже показатель активности по сравнению с участниками, выбравшими раздельную стратегию.</p> <p><bold>Заключение.</bold> Полученные факты вносят вклад в понимание выбора стратегий командной интеллектуальной деятельности и их взаимосвязей с персональными особенностями партнёров. Выявленные закономерности могут лечь в основу методик подбора людей, сотрудничающих при достижении интегральных результатов в различных сферах деятельности.</p></trans-abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="zh"><p>论证。在社会心理生理学中，研究团队活动成果达成策略及其选择因素，尤其在不同专业领域中，仍是一个重要课题。</p> <p>目的。揭示在具有人格特征和个人绩效差异的被试者二人组中达成认知活动共同结果的策略。</p> <p>材料与方法。共评估52对男性与50对女性组成的二人组（平均年龄17岁9个月±3个月，组内成员彼此熟识），所有参与者均签署知情同意书。个体人格特征采用“五大人格特质”法进行评估。受试者在三种条件下完成“模式识别”测试任务：单独完成、竞争模式下完成、二人协作完成。</p> <p>结果。识别出协作策略的两种类型——共同策略与分工策略，两者在综合成功率方面相当，并在总体样本及男性与女性二人组中呈现出相同的分布特征。采用不同协作策略的二人组在时间特征和错误率方面存在差异。在分工策略下，与共同策略相比，二人组完成测试的速度更快，识别出的规律更多，但同时错误率也更高。采用共同协作策略的受试者表现出更高的个体错误率、更大的组内差异，以及较分工策略组更一致的活动节奏。在采用共同策略的受试者对中，“理解性”和“放松度”的初始人格特质水平高于选择分工策略的参与者，而活跃度水平则较低。</p> <p>结论。所得结果有助于深化对团队智力活动中策略选择机制及其与组员个体特征之间关系的理解。所揭示的规律可为在多种活动领域中协作完成综合性任务时的人员选配方法提供依据。</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>joint cognitive activity strategies</kwd><kwd>task pace</kwd><kwd>error rate</kwd><kwd>intra-dyad difference</kwd><kwd>personality traits</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>стратегии совместной когнитивной деятельности</kwd><kwd>темп деятельности</kwd><kwd>ошибочность</kwd><kwd>внутридиадическая разница</kwd><kwd>личностные характеристики</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="zh"><kwd>协同认知策略</kwd><kwd>活动节奏</kwd><kwd>错误性</kwd><kwd>二人组内差异</kwd><kwd>人格特征</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="ru">Правительство РФ</institution></institution-wrap><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="en">Government of the Russian Federation</institution></institution-wrap><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="zh">Government of the Russian Federation</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source></award-group></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Chashchin VP, Kovshov AA, Gudkov AB, Morgunov BA. Socioeconomic and behavioral risk factors of disabilities among the indigenous population in the far north. Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology). 2016;23(6):3–8. doi: 10.33396/1728-0869-2016-6-3-8 EDN: VZZFET</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Giesinger I, Buajitti E, Siddiqi A, et al. The association between total social exposure and incident multimorbidity: A population-based cohort study. SSM Popul Health. 2024;29:101743. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101743</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Korneeva Yа, Simonova N. Job stress and working capacity among fly-in-fly-out workers in the oil and gas extraction industries in the Arctic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(21):7759. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217759 EDN: UGQELN</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Murtazina EP, Korobeynikova II, Poskotinova LV, et al. Analysis of cognitive functions and neurophysiological processes in adaptation of human to conditions of the Arctic region. IP Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2023;31(2):293–304. doi: 10.17816/PAVLOVJ109581 EDN: FLNEIA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Sidorov PI. Mental health service. Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology). 2014;21(8):44–56. doi: 10.17816/humeco17215 EDN: SMKJMD</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Andreatta PB, Graybill JC, Renninger CH, et al. Five influential factors for clinical team performance in urgent, emergency care contexts. Military Medicine. 2023;188(7-8):e2480–e2488. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac269</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Dawe J, Cronshaw H, Frerk C. Learning from the multidisciplinary team: advancing patient care through collaboration. Br J Hosp Med. 2024;85(5):1–4. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2023.0387</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Momennejad I. Collective minds: social network topology shapes collective cognition. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2022;377(1843):20200315. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0315</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Kozlowski SWJ. A multilevel, emergent journey to unpack team process dynamics. Small Group Research. 2024;56(3):487–523. doi: 10.1177/10464964241281347</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Child J, Faulkner D. Strategies of cooperation: managing alliances, networks, and joint ventures. Oxford University Press; 1998. 371 p. ISBN: 10: 0198774842</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Wahn B, Kingstone A, König P. Group benefits in joint perceptual tasks — а review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1426(1):166–178. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13843</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Gordon J, Knoblich G, Pezzulo G. Strategic task decomposition in joint action. Cogn Sci. 2023;47(7):e13316. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13316</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Gulati R, Wohlgezogen F, Zhelyazkov P. The two facets of collaboration: cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Annals. 2012;6(1):531–583. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2012.691646</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Belousova AK, Kachan YuM. Functional-role distribution of students in the joint solution of problems of different types. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy. 2024;34(1):26–37. doi: 10.35634/2412-9550-2024-34-1-26-37 EDN: EGZVYT</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Prewett MS, Brown MI, Goswami A, Christiansen ND. Effects of team personality composition on member performance: a multilevel perspective. Group &amp; Organization Management. 2018;43(2):316–348. doi: 10.1177/1059601116668633</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Jolić Marjanović Z, Krstić K, Rajić M, et al. The big five and collaborative problem solving: a narrative systematic review. European Journal of Personality. 2024;38(3):457–475. doi: 10.1177/08902070231198650</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Khromov AB. A five-factor personality questionnaire. Kurgan: Izd-vo Kurganskogo gosuniversiteta; 2000. 23 p. (In Russ.) ISBN: 5-86328-381-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Logutova EV. Diagnosis of cognitive development. Orenburg: OGU; 2021. 142 p. (In Russ.) EDN: MYFXGU</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Umryukhin YeA, Dzhebrailova T D, Korobeynikova II. Individual characteristics of achieving the results of purposeful activity and spectral characteristics of students’ EEG in a pre-examination situation. Psychological Journal. 2005;26(4):57–65. (In Russ.) EDN: HRWFIZ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Marlin D, Ketchen DJ, Lamont B. Equifinality and the strategic groups — performance relationship. Journal of Managerial Issues. 2007;19(2):208–232. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40604564</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>von Bertalanffy L. General system theory: foundations, development, applications. New York: G. Braziller; 1969. 289 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/generalsystemthe0000bert</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Anokhin PK. Fundamental issues of the general theory of functional systems. Moscow; 1971. 61 p. (In Russ.) URL: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_007229347</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Rosing F, Boer D, Buengeler C. When timing is key: how autocratic and democratic leadership relate to follower trust in emergency contexts. Front Psychol. 2022;13:904605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904605</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Wahn B, Czeszumski A, König P. Performance similarities predict collective benefits in dyadic and triadic joint visual search. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0191179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191179</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Dziura SL, Hosangadi A, Shariq D, et al. Partner similarity and social cognitive traits predict social interaction success among strangers. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023;18(1):nsad045. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Varfolomeyeva AV, Tishchenko AG, Aleхandrov YuI. Variants of mutual coordination of individuals with similar and different psychological characteristics. Experimental Psychology. 2024;17(2):84–97. doi: 10.17759/exppsy.2024170205. EDN: DRFEWI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Campos-Moinier K, Murday V, Brunel L. Individual differences in social interaction contexts: examining the role of personality traits in the degree of self-other integration. Personality and Individual Differences. 2022;203:112002. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.112002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Paletta P, Bass N, Aspesi D, Choleris E. Sex differences in social cognition. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2023;62:207–234. doi: 10.1007/7854_2022_325</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
