Water-Extractable Organic Matter of Soils with Different Degree of Degradation from Erosion and Sedimentation in a Small Catchment in the Central Forest-Steppe Part of the Central Russian Upland (Tillage Soils)

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Dissolved organic matter is the most mobile part of soil organic matter. At the same time, its change and transformation processes occuring during soil erosion have not been sufficiently studied. The goal of the work was to assess the optical properties of water-extractable organic matter (WEOM) in arable soils of different degree of degradation from erosion and sedimentation in a plowed small arable catchment in the Kursk region. We studied WEOM of arable Protocalcic Chernozems (noneroded and moderately eroded) and their analogue with soil matter sedimentation – Novic Protocalcic Chernozems. WEOM was isolated from aggregates 2–1 and >10 mm. Aqueous extracts were characterized by their organic carbon and nitrogen content. Optical properties were assessed based on absorption spectra and three-dimensional fluorescence spectra. It was shown that in terms of the main quantitative indicators of soil organic matter – the content of organic carbon and nitrogen, as well as the pH value – washed away and reclaimed soils were close to each other and differed significantly from Protocalcic Chernozems. At the same time, both the quantitative and qualitative indicators of WEOM showed a different trend: the WEOM of Novic Protocalcic Chernozems differed significantly from noneroded and moderately eroded Protocalcic Chernozems. Besides, some indicators of WEOM (nitrogen content, SUVA254, S350–400 и SR) depended on the size of the aggregates from which WEOM was obtained (2–1 or >10 mm). In addition, the fluorescent properties of WEOM depend on the size of the aggregates. The obtained data allow us to conclude that the properties of WEOM in a small arable catchment in the central forest-steppe zone are largely determined by the processes of destruction of non-water-stable aggregates and the consolidation of their particles, as well as the leaching of water-soluble organic matter. When aggregates are destroyed by water, their particles migrate with flows along the slope, and organic matter undergoes decomposition; in depressions, particles accumulate, consolidate into blocky structural units, while the properties of their WEOM change significantly, both due to the degradation of organic matter and as a result of its leaching.

作者简介

V. Kholodov

Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vkholod@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6896-7897
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

N. Yaroslavtseva

Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute

Email: vkholod@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

A. Ziganshina

Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute

Email: vkholod@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

N. Danchenko

Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute

Email: vkholod@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Yu. Farkhodov

Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute

Email: vkholod@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

S. Maksimovich

Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute

Email: vkholod@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

A. Zhidkin

Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute

Email: vkholod@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Жидкин А.П., Комиссаров М.А., Шамшурина Е.Н., Мищенко А.В. Эрозия почв на Cреднерусской возвышенности (обзор) // Почвоведение. 2023. № 2. С. 259–272. https:/ /doi.org/10.31857/ S 0032180 X 22600901
  2. Караванова Е.И. Водорастворимые органические вещества: фракционный состав и возможности их сорбции твердой фазой лесных почв // Почвоведение. 2013. № 8. С. 924–936.
  3. Каштанов А.Н., Явтушенко В.Е. Агроэкология почв склонов. М.: Колос, 1997. С. 88–107.
  4. Классификация и диагностика почв России. Смоленск: Ойкумена, 2004. 342 с.
  5. Классификация и диагностика почв СССР. М.: Колос, 1977. 223 с.
  6. Кошовский Т.С. Латеральная миграция твердофазного вещества лесостепных почв в ландшафтно-геохимических аренах среднерусской возвышенности. Автореф. дис. … канд. геогр. наук. М., 2019. 25 с.
  7. Куликова Н.А. Влияние водорастворимых компонентов почв на размер и электрокинетический потенциал наноалмазов // Почвоведение. 2020. № 7. С. 816–827.
  8. Орлов Д.С., Бирюкова О.Н., Суханова Н.И. Органическое вещество почв Российской Федерации. М.: Наука, 1996. 256 с.
  9. Орлов Д.С., Садовникова Л.K., Суханова Н.И. Химия почв М.: Высш. шк., 2005. 558 с.
  10. Пансю М., Готеру Ж. Анализ почвы. Справочник. Минералогические, органические и неорганические методы анализа. СПб.: ЦОП Профессия, 2014. 800 с.
  11. Семенов В.М., Когут Б.М. Почвенное органическое вещество М.: ГЕОС, 2015. 233 с.
  12. Лисецкий Ф.Н, Светличный А.А., Черный С.Г. Современные проблемы эрозиоведения / Под ред. Светличного А.А. Белгород: Константа, 2012. 456 с.
  13. Холодов В.А. Способность почвенных частиц самопроизвольно образовывать макроагрегаты после цикла увлажнения и высушивания // Почвоведение. 2013. № 6. С. 698–706.
  14. Холодов В.А., Иванов В.А., Фарходов Ю.Р., Сафронова Н.А., Артемьева З.С., Ярославцева Н.В. Оптические характеристики фракций органического вещества агрегатов типичных черноземов // Бюл. Почв. Ин-та им. В.В. Докучаева. 2017. Вып. 90. С. 56–72. https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2017-90-56-72
  15. Холодов В.А., Ярославцева Н.В., Фарходов Ю.Р., Яшин М.А., Лазарев В.И., Ильин Б.С., Филиппова О.И., Воликов А.Б., Иванов А.Л. Оптические характеристики экстрагируемых фракций органического вещества типичных черноземов в многолетних полевых опытах // Почвоведение. 2020. № 6. С. 691–702. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032180X20060052
  16. Чеботина М.Я. Влияние водорастворимого вещества лесной подстилки на поглощение радиоактивных изотопов в почве // Радиоэкологические исследования почв и растений. Тр. Ин - та экологии растений и животных. Свердловск, 1975. С. 21–25.
  17. Bengtsson M.M., Attermeyer K., Catalán N. Interactive effects on organic matter processing from soils to the ocean: are priming effects relevant in aquatic ecosystems? // Hydrobiologia. 2018. V. 822. P. 1–17.
  18. Bistarelli T.L., Poyntner C., Santín C., Doerr S.H., Talluto M. V., Singer G., Sigmund G. Wildfire-derived pyrogenic carbon modulates riverine organic matter and biofilm enzyme activities in an in situ flume experiment // ACS ES&T Water. 2021. V. 1. P. 1648–1656.
  19. Chang D.N., Cao W.D., Bai J.S., Gao S.J., Wang X.C., Zeng N.H., Katsuyoshi S. Spectrosc. Spectral Anal. 2017. V. 37. P. 221–226.
  20. Chantigny M.H. Dissolved and water-extractable organic matter in soils: A review on the influence of land use and management practices // Geoderma. 2003. V. 113. P. 357–380.
  21. Chen M., Jung J., Lee Y.K., Hur J. Surface accumulation of low molecular weight dissolved organic matter in surface waters and horizontal off-shelf spreading of nutrients and humic-like fluorescence in the Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean // Sci. Total Environ. 2018. V. 639. P. 624–632.
  22. Coble P.G. Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy // Marine Chemistry. 1996. V. 51. P. 325–346.
  23. Eder A., Weigelhofer G., Pucher M., Tiefenbacher A., Strauss P., Brandl M., Blöschl G. Pathways and composition of dissolved organic carbon in a small agricultural catchment during base flow conditions // Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 2022. V. 22. P. 96–112.
  24. Gao Z., Guéguen C. Size distribution of absorbing and fluorescing DOM in Beaufort Sea, Canada Basin // Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 2017. V. 121. P. 30 –37.
  25. Gmach M.R., Cherubin M.R., Kaiser K., Cerri C.E.P. Processes that influence dissolved organic matter in the soil: A review // Sci. Agric. 2020. V. 77. P. 1–10.
  26. Gold-Bouchot G., Polis S., Castañon L.E., Flores M.P., Alsante A.N., Thornton D.C.O. Chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in a subtropical estuary (Galveston Bay, USA) and the impact of Hurricane Harvey // Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2021. V. 28. P. 53045–53057.
  27. Groeneveld M., Catalán N., Attermeyer K., Hawkes J., Einarsdóttir K., Kothawala D. Selective adsorption ofterrestrial dissolved organic matter toinorganic surfaces along a boreal inlandwater continuum // J. Geophys. Res: Biogeosciences, 2020. V. 125. P. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005236
  28. Helms J.R., Stubbins A., Ritchie J.D., Minor E.C., Kieber D.J., Mopper K. Absorption spectral slopes and slope ratios as indicators of molecular weight, source, and photobleaching of chromophoric dissolved organic matter // Limnology and Oceanography. 2008. V. 53. P. 955–969.
  29. ISO 10694:1995 Soil quality – Determination of organic and total carbon after dry combustion (elementary analysis).
  30. ISO 8245:1999 Water quality – Guidelines for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC).
  31. IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps // FAO. World Soil Resources Reports. 2014. V. 106. P. 203.
  32. Kalbitz K., Solinger S., Park J.H., Michalzik B., Matzner E. Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in soils: a review // Soil Sci. 2000. V. 165. P. 277–304.
  33. Kida M., Kojima T., Tanabe Y., Hayashi K., Kudoh S., Maie N., Fujitake N. Origin, distributions, and environmental significance of ubiquitous humic-like fluorophores in Antarctic lakes and streams // Water Res. 2019. V. 163. P. 114901.
  34. Mann P.J., Spencer R.G.M., Hernes P.J., Six J., Aiken G.R., Tank S.E., McClelland J.W., et al. Pan-Arctic trends in terrestrial dissolved organic matter from optical measurements // Front. Earth Sci. 2016. V. 4. P. 1–19.
  35. Meteoblue, Switzerland. https://www.meteoblue.com
  36. Murphy K.R., Stedmon C.A., Graeber D., Bro R. Fluorescence spectroscopy and multi-way techniques. PARAFAC // Anal. Methods. 2013. V 5. P. 6557–6566.
  37. OpenFluor, Lablicate GmbH. https://openfluor.lablicate.com/home
  38. Osburn C.L., Wigdahl C.R., Fritz S.C., Saros J.E. Dissolved organic matter composition and photoreactivity in prairie lakes of the U.S. Great Plains // Limnology and Oceanography. 2011. V. 56. P. 2371–2390.
  39. Panettieri M., Guigue J., Chemidlin Prevost-Bouré N., Thévenot M., Lévêque J., Guillou C. Le, Maron P.A. et al. Grassland-cropland rotation cycles in crop-livestock farming systems regulate priming effect potential in soils through modulation of microbial communities, composition of soil organic matter and abiotic soil properties // Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2020. V. 299. P. 106973.
  40. Parton W., Schimel D., Ojima D., Cole C. A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: sensitivity to litter chemistry, texture and management // Quantitative Modeling of Soil Forming Processes / Eds. Bryant R.B., Arnold R.W. SSSA Spec. Publ., 1994. V. 39. P. 147–167.
  41. Paul E.A. The nature and dynamics of soil organic matter: Plant inputs, microbial transformations, and organic matter stabilization // Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016. V. 98. P. 109–126.
  42. Pitta E., Zeri C. The impact of combining data sets of fluorescence excitation – emission matrices of dissolved organic matter from various aquatic sources on the information retrieved by PARAFAC modeling // Spectrochimica Acta – Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2021. V. 258. P. 119800.
  43. Pucher M. PARAFAC analysis of EEM data to separate DOM components in R staRdom : spectroscopic analysis of dissolved organic matter in R 1. https://cran.r-project.org/web//packages/staRdom/vignettes/PARAFAC_analysis_of_EEM.html
  44. Pucher M., Wünsch U., Weigelhofer G., Murphy K., Hein T., Graeber D. StaRdom: Versatile software for analyzing spectroscopic data of dissolved organic matter in R. Water (Switzerland), 2019. V. 11. P. https://doi.org/10.3390/ w11112366
  45. Rodrigues S.M., Trindade T., Duarte A.C., Pereira E., Koopmans G.F., Römkens P.F.A.M. A framework to measure the availability of engineered nanoparticles in soils: Trends in soil tests and analytical tools // TrAC – Trends Anal. Chem. 2016. V. 75. P. 129–140.
  46. Roper M.M., Gupta V., Murphy D. Tillage practices altered labile soil organic carbon and microbial function without affecting crop yields // Austral. J. Soil Res. 2010. V. 48. P. 274–285.
  47. Sharma P., Laor Y., Raviv M., Medina S., Saadi I., Krasnovsky A., Vager M., Levy G.J., Bar-Tal A., Borisover M. Compositional characteristics of organic matter and its water-extractable components across a profile of organically managed soil // Geoderma. 2017. V. 286. P. 73–82.
  48. Six J., Conant R.T., Paul E., Paustian K. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils // Plant Soil. 2002. V. 241. P. 155–176.
  49. Stockdale A., Bryan N.D. The influence of natural organic matter on radionuclide mobility under conditions relevant to cementitious disposal of radioactive wastes: A review of direct evidence // Earth-Science Rev. 2013. V. 121. P. 1–17.
  50. Tisdall J.M., Oades J.M. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils // J. Soil Sci. 1982. V. 62. P. 141–163.
  51. Toosi E.R., Schmidt J.P., Castellano M.J. Land use and hydrologic flowpaths interact to affect dissolved organic matter and nitrate dynamics // Biogeochemistry. 2014. V. 120. P. 89–104.
  52. Van Gaelen N., Verschoren V., Clymans W., Poesen J., Govers G., Vanderborght J., Diels J. Controls on dissolved organic carbon export through surface runoff from loamy agricultural soils. // Geoderma. 2014. V. 226–227. P. 387–396.
  53. Vergnoux A., Di Rocco R., Domeizel M., Guiliano M., Doumenq P., Theraulaz F. Effects of forest fires on water extractable organic matter and humic substances from Mediterranean soils: UV–vis and fluorescence spectroscopy approaches // Geoderma. 2011. V. 160. P. 434–443.
  54. Walker S.A., Amon R.M.W., Stedmon C.A. Variations in high-latitude riverine fluorescent dissolved organic matter: A comparison of large Arctic rivers // J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences. 2014. V. 118. P. 1689–1702.
  55. Wünsch U.J., Geuer J.K., Lechtenfeld O.J., Koch B.P., Murphy K.R., Stedmon C.A. Quantifying the impact of solid-phase extraction on chromophoric dissolved organic matter composition // Marine Chem. 2018. V. 207. P. 33–41.
  56. Wünsch U.J., Murphy K.R., Stedmon C.A. The One-Sample PARAFAC Approach Reveals Molecular Size Distributions of Fluorescent Components in Dissolved Organic Matter // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017. V. 51. P. 11900–11908.
  57. Yamashita Y., Maie N., Briceño H., Jaffé R. Optical characterization of dissolved organic matter in tropical rivers of the Guayana Shield, Venezuela // J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences. 2010. V. 115. P. 1–15.
  58. Yamashita Y., Panton A., Mahaffey C., Jaffe R. Assessing the spatial and temporal variability of dissolved organic matter in Liverpool Bay using excitation–emission matrix fluorescence and parallel factor analysis // Ocean Dynamics. 2011. V. 61. P. 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-010-0365-4
  59. Yamashita Y., Scinto L.J., Maie N., Jaffe, R. dissolved organic matter characteristics across a subtropical wetland’s landscape: application of optical properties in the assessment of environmental dynamics // Ecosystems. 2010. V. 13. P. 1006–1019.
  60. Zhou X., Johnston S.E., Bogard M.J. Organic matter cycling in a model restored wetland receiving complex effluent // Biogeochemistry. 2023. V. 162. P. 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-01002-x

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of humus layer depths in non-eroded chernozem (P), medium-eroded chernozem (E), stratozem (S)

下载 (165KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. Content in arable soil horizons of organic carbon (OC), nitrogen (N); pH value of water extract and the amount of dissolved organic carbon extracted by water extract 1 : 5 (DEOC). X-axis designations: P - non-leached chernozem; E - medium-leached chernozem; S - stratozem. Identical lowercase Latin letters at the columns of histograms indicate insignificance of differences in the mean between groups (analysis of variance at α = 0.05)

下载 (286KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. Water-extractable nitrogen content in aggregates 2-1 mm and clumps > 10 mm of arable soil horizons. P - non-leached chernozem; E - medium-leached chernozem; S - stratozem

下载 (111KB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. 4. Averaged absorption spectra of HEOV of arable soil horizons. Mean values with standard deviations of Napierian absorption coefficients α(λ) - Napierian absorption coefficients as a function of wavelength are given. P - non-leached chernozem; E - medium-leached chernozem; S - stratozem

下载 (146KB)
索引源数据
6. Fig. 5. SUVA254, S350-400 and SR VEOV indices of 2-1 mm aggregates and clumps > 10 mm of arable soil horizons. P - non-leached chernozem; E - medium leached chernozem; S - stratozem

下载 (251KB)
索引源数据
7. Fig. 6. Examples of three-dimensional HEOV fluorescence spectra of arable soil horizons. P - non-washed chernozem; E - medium-washed chernozem; S - stratozem, RU - Raman units

下载 (680KB)
索引源数据
8. Fig. 7. Components obtained by decomposition of the 3D fluorescence spectra of the used HEOV sample using PARAFAC. Each component is normalised to its intensity maximum

下载 (937KB)
索引源数据
9. Fig. 8. HEOV of aggregates 2-1 mm (open symbols) and clumps > 10 mm (filled symbols) of arable soil horizons (highlighted by ovals): P - non-leached chernozem; E - medium-leached chernozem; S - stratozem

下载 (406KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024