THE SOCIAL HYGIENIC FACTORS OF QUALITY OF LIFE OF POPULATION OF THE PRIMORSKY KRAI

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

At the modern stage of society development, even more number of professionals of the most various specialties show interest in problems of estimating level and quality of life of population. The study was carried out to analyze main indices of quality of life of population of the Primorsky Krai. The study used statistical information characterizing quality of life of population (indices of issues of demography, ecology, labor, level of life of population, education, medical and social care). The analysis of quality of life of population of the Primorsky Krai during 2004-2013 according indicator of "crisis" index testifies that a trend of increasing of level of life of population is observed. The complex evaluation of quality of life using factor analysis demonstrated that 81.7% of total variance is described by by main component. In main component prevail variables of economic and social character, demographic indices and also indices of population health, housing conditions and ecological environment. The main component proved to be very significant in characterizing quality of life of population of the Primorsky Krai. The obtained results demonstrate that factually all selected factors in a certain degree effect quality of life of population that one more time proves all multiform and complexity of quality of life concept. Therefore, quality of life is a complex characteristic of conditions of vital activity of population that is reflected in objective indices and subjective estimates of satisfaction of material, social, cultural needs and is related to perception of people of one's own positioning depending on cultural features, system of values and social standards existing in society.

Sobre autores

O. Izmaylova

The F.F. Erisman Federal Research Center of Hygiene

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: oxanizm@gmail.com
Rússia

P. Kiku

The Far-Eastern Federal University, School of Biomedicine

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Rússia

N. Shiter

The Far-Eastern Federal University, School of Biomedicine

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Rússia

V. Moreva

The Far-Eastern Federal University, School of Biomedicine

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Rússia

K. Sabirova

The Far-Eastern Federal University, School of Biomedicine

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Rússia

K. Kondrat’Ev

The Far-Eastern Federal University, School of Biomedicine

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Rússia

N. Kutakova

The F.F. Erisman Federal Research Center of Hygiene

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Rússia

Bibliografia

  1. Захарова Р.Н., Михайлова А.Е., Кривошапкин В.Г. Методологические аспекты исследования качества жизни. Якутский медицинский журнал. 2012; 37(1): 51-3.
  2. Кузьмичёв Л.А., Фёдоров М.В., Задесенец Е.Е. (ред.) Качество жизни: сущность, оценка, стратегия формирования. М.: ВНИИТЭ; 2000.
  3. Кику П.Ф., Ярыгина М.В., Юдин С.С. Образ жизни, среда обитания и здоровье населения Приморского края. Владивосток: Дальнаука; 2013.
  4. Кику П.Ф., Жигаев Д.С., Шитер Н.С. и др. Концепция факторов риска для здоровья населения. Бюллетень физиологии и патологии дыхания. 2016; 62: 101-17.
  5. Шайкин Д.Н. Сущность и проблемы оценки качества жизни. Региональная экономика: теория и практика. 2007; 46(7): 15-20.
  6. Bowling A. Measuring health. A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. 3rd Ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2005.
  7. World Health Organization. Quality of life group. What is it Quality of life? Wid. Hth. Forum.1996; 1: 29.
  8. Андреева О.Н. Способы оценки уровня и качества жизни населения. Регионоведческие исследования. 2013; (2): 112-20.
  9. Дорофеев С.Б., Бабенко А.И. Национальные стратегии формирования здорового образа жизни населения. Здравоохр.Рос. Федерации. 2015; 59(6): 44-7.
  10. Коршевер Н.Г., Сидельников С.А. Межсекторальное взаимодействие по вопросам охраны здоровья населения. Здравоохр. Рос. Федерации. 2013; 57(4): 7-10.
  11. Бузинов Р.В., Кику П.Ф., Унгуряну Т.Н., Ярыгина М.В., Гудков А.Б. От Поморья до Приморья: социально-гигиенические и экологические проблемы здоровья населения. Архангельск: ИД Северного государственного медицинского университета; 2016.
  12. Quinten C., Coens С., Mauer М. Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 9(10): 15-8.
  13. Santos L.D., Martins I., Brito P. Measuring subjective quality of life: A survey to Porto’s residents. Appl. Res.Quality Life. 2010; 1(2): 51-64.
  14. Santos L.D., Martins I. The Monitoring System on Quality of Life of the City of Porto. Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases Series IV. New York, London: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg; 2013.
  15. Second European Quality of Life Survey. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2009.
  16. Панкратова Е.В. Комплексная методика оценки качества жизни региона. Вестник ИГЭУ. 2009; (1): 1-7.
  17. Naito M., Nakayama T., Fukuhara S. Quality of life assessment and reporting in randomized controlled trials: a study of literature published from Japan. Hlth Quality Life Outcomes. 2004; (2): 31.
  18. Реброва О.Ю. Статистический анализ медицинских данных. Применение пакета прикладных программ STATISTICA. М.: Медиа Сфера; 2002.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Izmaylova O.A., Kiku P.F., Shiter N.S., Moreva V.G., Sabirova K.M., Kondrat’Ev K.V., Kutakova N.S., 2020

Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ:  ПИ № ФС77-50668 от 13.07.2012 г.