The modern paradigm for the development of the system of management of the quality and safety of medical activities (literature review)

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

The further development of Russian healthcare system requires a solution to the issue of forming a national system for managing of the quality and safety of medical activities. There is no consolidated opinion on the goals, objectives and indicators characterizing the activities of a high-quality national health system, which requires the study and additional analysis of foreign experience.

Purpose. Analysis of foreign experience in the development of the management system of the quality and safety of medical activities at the present stage.

In the systems PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct by Elsevier, Research Gate, a systematic search, selection and subsequent analysis of publications reflecting international experience in the development of management system of the quality and safety of medical activities were carried out.

The modern paradigm of the development of management system of the quality and safety of medical activities consists in the harmonious implementation of scientifically based and generally recognized tools at the national level.

Modern healthcare faces challenges in four main areas: increasing the cost of medical services; dependence on technology; the need to reduce costs while continuously improving quality indicators; patients’ needs meeting. Most countries go through the professional model of quality management in health care, through the administrative model, to the formation of an industrial model, when solving these problems.

The industrial model completely corresponds to modern scientific ideas about management quality of medical care. Necessary condition for its implementation is a preliminary assessment of the industry’s readiness for innovations and a consistent policy in this area.

Contribution of the authors:
Kuchin N.E. — research concept and design, collection and processing of material, writing the text, compilation of the list of literature.
Tyukov Yu.A. — editing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Acknowledgment. The study had no sponsorship.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest. 

Received: April 27, 2021
Accepted: May 19, 2021
Published: August 30, 2022

Sobre autores

Nikita Kuchin

Federal Service on Surveillance in Healthcare in the Chelyabinsk Region; South-Ural State Medical University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: kuchinne@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3206-0214

MD, PhD, Deputy Head of the Control and Supervision for Medical Activities Department, Federal Service on Surveillance in Healthcare in the Chelyabinsk Region, Chelyabinsk, 454091, Russian Federation.

e-mail: kuchinne@gmail.com 

Rússia

Yuriy Tyukov

South-Ural State Medical University

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3230-3244
Rússia

Bibliografia

  1. Druică E., Wu B., Cepoi V., Mihăilă V., Burcea M. Testing the strength of hospital accreditation as a signal of the quality of care in Romania: do patients’ and health professionals’ perceptions align? Healthcare (Basel). 2020; 8(3): 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030349
  2. Taylor M.J., McNicholas C., Nicolay C., Darzi A., Bell D., Reed J.E. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2014; 23(4): 290-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862
  3. Kruk M.E., Pate M., Mullan Z.Introducing The Lancet Global Health Commission on high-quality health systems in the SDG era. Lancet Glob. Health. 2017; 5(5): e4801. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30101-8
  4. Dodwad S.S. Quality management in healthcare. Indian J. Public Health. 2013; 57(3): 138-43. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-557X.119814
  5. Brenner S., Wilhelm D., Lohmann J., Kambala C., Chinkhumba J., Muula A.S., et al. Implementation research to improve quality of maternal and newborn health care, Malawi. Bull. World Health Organ. 2017; 95(7): 491-502. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.16.178202
  6. Marjoua Y., Bozic K.J. Brief history of quality movement in US healthcare. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. 2012; 5(4): 265-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-012-9137-8
  7. Wright J.R. Jr. The American College of Surgeons, minimum standards for hospitals, and the provision of high-quality laboratory services. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2017; 141(5): 704-17. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0348-HP
  8. Comfere N.I., Matulis J.C. 3rd, O’Horo J.C. Quality improvement and healthcare: The mayo clinic quality academy experience. J. Clin. Tuberc. Other Mycobact. Dis. 2020; 20: 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctube.2020.100170
  9. Alkhenizan A., Shaw C. Impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services: a systematic review of the literature. Ann. Saudi. Med. 2011; 31(4): 407-16. https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.83204
  10. Sheingold B.H., Joyce A. Hahn J.A. The history of healthcare quality: The first 100 years 1860-1960.Int. J. Africa Nursing Sci. 2014; 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2014.05.002
  11. Best M., Neuhauser D. W Edwards Deming: father of quality management, patient and composer. Qual. Saf. Health Care. 2005; 14(4): 310-2. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.015289
  12. Best M., Neuhauser D. Walter A Shewhart, 1924, and the Hawthorne factory. Qual. Saf. Health Care. 2006; 15(2): 142-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.018093
  13. Lavelle J., Schast A., Keren R. Standardizing care processes and improving quality using pathways and continuous quality improvement. Curr. Treat. Options Peds. 2015; 1(4): 347-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-015-0026-4
  14. Biancone P., Silvana S., Brescia V. Popular report and consolidated financial statements in public utilities. Different tools to inform the citizens, a long journey of the transparency.Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2016; 7(1): 111-24.
  15. Viswanathan H.N., Salmon J.W. Accrediting organizations and quality improvement. Am. J. Manag. Care. 2000; 6(10): 1117-30.
  16. Busse R., Klazinga N., Panteli D., eds. Improving healthcare quality in Europe: Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies. Health Policy Series, No. 53. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549276/
  17. Al Shawan D. The effectiveness of the joint commission international accreditation in improving quality at King Fahd University Hospital, Saudi Arabia: a mixed methods approach. J. Healthc. Leadersh. 2021; 13: 47-61. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S288682
  18. Halasa Y.A., Zeng W., Chappy E., Shepard D.S. Value and impact of international hospital accreditation: a case study from Jordan. East Mediterr. Health J. 2015; 21(2): 90-9. https://doi.org/10.26719/2015.21.90
  19. Tricker R. ISO 9001:2015 in Brief. New York: Routledge; 2016.
  20. Shaw C.D., Groene O., Botje D., Sunol R., Kutryba B., Klazinga N., et al. The effect of certification and accreditation on quality management in 4 clinical services in 73 European hospitals.Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2014; 26 (Suppl. 1): 100-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzu023
  21. Kohn L.T., Corrigan J.M., Donaldson M.S., eds. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington: National Academies Press (US); 2000.
  22. Donaldson M.S. An overview of to err is human: re-emphasizing the message of patient safety. In: Hughes R.G., ed. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Apr. Chapter 3. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2673/
  23. Bates D.W., Singh H. Two decades since to err is human: an assessment of progress and emerging priorities in patient safety. Health Aff. (Millwood). 2018; 37(11): 1736-43. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0738
  24. Breckenkamp J., Wiskow C., Laaser U. Progress on quality management in the German health system - a long and winding road. Health Res. Policy. Syst. 2007; 5: 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-5-7
  25. Birkner B.R. National quality of care activities in Germany.Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 1998; 10(5): 451-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/10.5.451
  26. WHO. Legido-Quigley H., McKee M., Nolte E., Glinos I.A. Assuring the Quality of Healthcare in the European Union. A Case for Action. Geneva; 2008.
  27. Ngo D., Breejen E.D., Putter K., Bal R. Supervising the Quality of Care in Changing Healthcare Systems an International Comparison. Rotterdam; 2008.
  28. Geraedts M., Schwartze D., Molzahn T. Hospital quality reports in Germany: patient and physician opinion of the reported quality indicators. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2007; 7: 157. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-157
  29. Keßler W., Heidecke C.D. Dimensions of quality and their increasing relevance for visceral medicine in Germany. Visc. Med. 2017; 33(2): 119-24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000462997
  30. Anderson J.A. Evolution of the health care quality journey. From cost reduction to facilitating patient safety. J. Leg. Med. 2010; 31(1): 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01947641003598252
  31. Berwick D.M., Knapp M.G. Theory and practice for measuring health care quality. Health Care Financ. Rev. 1987; Spec No(Suppl.): 49-55.
  32. Grosios K., Gahan P.B., Burbidge J. Overview of healthcare in the UK. EPMA J. 2010; 1(4): 529-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-010-0050-1
  33. Friebel R., Molloy A., Leatherman S., Dixon J., Bauhoff S., Chalkidou K. Achieving high-quality universal health coverage: a perspective from the National Health Service in England. BMJ Glob. Health. 2018; 3(6): e000944. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000944
  34. Richardson E., Walshe K., Boyd A., Roberts J., Wenzel L., Robertson R., et al. User involvement in regulation: A qualitative study of service user involvement in Care Quality Commission inspections of health and social care providers in England. Health Expect. 2019; 22(2): 245-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12849
  35. Kool R.B., Kleefstra S.M., Borghans I., Atsma F., van de Belt T.H. Influence of intensified supervision by health care inspectorates on online patient ratings of hospitals: a multilevel study of more than 43,000 online ratings. J. Med.Internet Res. 2016; 18(7): e198. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5884
  36. Weenink J.W., Wallenburg I., Leistikow I., Bal R.A. Publication of inspection frameworks: a qualitative study exploring the impact on quality improvement and regulation in three healthcare settings. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2020; 30(10): 804-11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011337
  37. Tashayoei N., Raeissi P., Nasiripour A.A. Challenges of implementation of hospital accreditation in Iran: an exploratory factor analysis. J. Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2020; 95(1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-019-0033-6
  38. Brubakk K., Vist G.E., Bukholm G., Barach P., Tjomsland O. A systematic review of hospital accreditation: the challenges of measuring complex intervention effects. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2015; 15: 280. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0933-x
  39. Andres E.B., Song W., Song W., Johnston J.M. Can hospital accreditation enhance patient experience? Longitudinal evidence from a Hong Kong hospital patient experience survey. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2019; 19(1): 623. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4452-z
  40. Smits H., Supachutikul A., Mate K.S. Hospital accreditation: lessons from low- and middle-income countries. Global Health. 2014; 10: 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-014-0065-9
  41. Corrêa J.É., Turrioni J.B., de Paiva A.P., Paes V.C., Balestrassi P.P., Papandrea P.J., et al. The influence of accreditation on the sustainability of organizations with the Brazilian Accreditation Methodology. J. Healthc. Eng. 2018; 2018: 1393585. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1393585
  42. Aryankhesal A. Strategic faults in implementation of hospital accreditation programs in developing countries: reflections on the Iranian experience.Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 2016; 5(9): 515-17. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.70
  43. Barghouthi E.D., Imam A. Patient satisfaction: comparative study between joint commission international accredited and non-accredited Palestinian hospitals. Health Sci. J. 2018; 12(1): 547. https://doi.org/10.21767/1791-809x.1000547

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Kuchin N.E., Tyukov Y.A., 2022

Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ:  ПИ № ФС77-50668 от 13.07.2012 г.