Hygienic aspects of accumulation of arsenic in fish grown in natural and artificial conditions

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Introduction. World consumption of fish per capita will reach 21.2 kg in 2030, compared to an average of 20.5 kg in 2018–2020. Fish accumulate arsenic, which then enters the human body with food. An acute problem is the hygienic aspects of accumulation of arsenic in fish grown in natural and artificial (aquaculture) conditions.

Purpose of the study. Assessment of hygienic safety for consumers when eating fish grown under natural conditions versus those raised on fish farms.

Materials and methods. The objects of the study are Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii). The methods of isolating total arsenic and inorganic arsenic by microwave decomposition, as well as the method of sequential fractionation for isolating arsenic in the form of complex organic compounds were used. Arsenic in all fractions and forms of existence of the element was determined by ICP-MC. Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks were calculated.

Results. Data on arsenic distribution in sturgeon parts and organs were obtained. Based on this, the following sequence of total arsenic decrease was compiled: liver > (intestine + stomach) with contents > caviar ≈ fillet > head (without gills) > skeleton with visiga > gills > skin without scales. Up to 27% of all accumulated arsenic is associated with adipose tissue with the formation of complex compounds with lipids. The levels of carcinogenic risk for inorganic forms of arsenic according to the acceptance criteria are below the target risk value. None of the sturgeon samples had non-carcinogenic risk values > 1.

Research limitations. Only one species of fish (sturgeon) was used in the studies.

Conclusion. The conducted sequential fractionation of arsenic forms allowed detecting the proportion of fat-soluble, water-soluble arsenic compounds in sturgeon fillets and caviar in relation to the total content. Comparative analysis of arsenic compounds in fish grown in natural and artificial conditions did not reveal significant differences in its distribution between the two methods of cultivation. As a result of the conducted studies, the use of Siberian sturgeon was established to do not pose a danger to human health.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require a biomedical ethics committee opinion.

Contribution of the authors:
Rakitskiy V.N., Onishchenko G.G., Fedorova N.E. — concept and design of the study;
Bondareva L.G. — collection and processing of material, writing the text, editing;
Fedorova N.E. — collection and processing of material, writing the text, editing.
All co-authors — approved the final version of the article, are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the article.

Acknowledgment. The authors are grateful to the staff of the Center for Collective Use of the Siberian Federal University for assistance in conducting the research. The study had no sponsorship.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 Received: November 25, 2024 / Accepted: December 11, 2024 / Published: February 28, 2025

About the authors

Gennadiy G. Onishchenko

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0135-7258

DSc (Medicine), academician of RAS, Head of the Department of Human Ecology and Environmental Hygiene of the Faculty of Preventive Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Valery N. Rakitskiy

Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Email: vtox@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9959-6507

DSc (Medicine), academician of RAS, Scientific Director of the Institute of Hygiene, Pesticide Toxicology and Chemical Safety, Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: vtox@yandex.ru

Lydia G. Bondareva

Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Email: lydiabondareva@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1482-6319

PhD (Chemistry), Senior Researcher, Department of an analytical control methods, Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: lydiabondareva@gmail.com

Natalyia E. Fedorova

Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Author for correspondence.
Email: natali53fed@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8278-6382

DSc (Biology), Chief Researcher, Department of an analytical control methods, Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: natali53fed@yandex.ru

References

  1. Surface Water Quality of the Russian Federation. Yearbook – 2019 [Kachestvo poverkhnostnykh vod Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Ezhegodnik – 2019]. Rostov-na-Donu: Rosgidromet; 2020. (in Russian)
  2. Chernogaeva G.M., ed. Review of the State and Pollution of the Environment in the Russian Federation for 2021 [Obzor sostoyaniya i zagryazneniya okruzhayushchei sredy v Rossiiskoi Federatsii za 2021 god]. Moscow: Rosgidromet; 2022. (in Russian)
  3. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum. 2012; 100(Pt. C): 11–465.
  4. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021–2030. Fish. OECD/FAO; 2021. Available at: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/f5f1d519-dca8-4b55-8c0b-f7de6e7a7a48/content
  5. The State of Food and Agriculture; 2006. Available at: https://www.fao.org/4/a0800e/a0800e00.htm
  6. Department of Rospotrebnadzor in the Altai Republic. Fish and fish products, and their importance in nutrition. Available at: http://pda.04.rospotrebnadzor.ru/index.php/press-center/healthy-lifestyle/13489-29102020.html (in Russian)
  7. Gusso-Choueri P.K., Araújo G.S., Cruz A.C.F., Stremel T.R.O., Campos S.X., Abessa D.M.S., et al. Metals and arsenic in fish from a Ramsar site under past and present human pressures: Consumption risk factors to the local population. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018; 628-629: 621–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.005
  8. Avigliano E.A.F., Carvalho B.B., Velasco G.C., Tripodi P.D., Vianna M.E., Volpedo A.V.A. Nursery areas and connectivity of the adults anadromous catfish (Genidens barbus) revealed by otolith-core microchemistry in the south-western Atlantic Ocean. Marine Freshwater Res. 2016; 68(5): 931–40. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF16058
  9. Avigliano E., Maichak de Carvalho B., Invernizzi R., Olmedo M., Jasan R., Volpedo A.V. Arsenic, selenium, and metals in a commercial and vulnerable fish from southwestern Atlantic estuaries: distribution in water and tissues and public health risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019; 26(8): 7994–8006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04258-3
  10. Tavares L.E., Luque J.L. Community ecology of the metazoan parasites of white sea catfish, Netuma barba (Osteichthyes: Ariidae), from the coastal zone of the state of Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. Braz J. Biol. 2004; 64(1): 169–76. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-69842004000100019
  11. Taylor V., Goodale B., Raab A., Schwerdtle T., Reimer K., Conklin S., et al. Human exposure to organic arsenic species from seafood. Sci. Total Environ. 2017; 580: 266–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.113
  12. Solodukhina M.A. Chelovecheskogo ore district of the Zabaikalsky krai. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovanii. 2014; (11-3): 377–82. https://elibrary.ru/tacjch (in Russain)
  13. Francesconi K.A., Stick R.V., Edmonds J.S. Glycerylphosphorylarsenocholine and phosphatidylarsenocholine in Yelloweye Mullet (Aldrichetta-Forsteri) following oraladministration of arsenocholine. Experientia. 1990; 46(5): 464–6.
  14. Sanders J.G., Osman R.W., Riedel G.F. Pathways of arsenic uptake and incorporation in estuarine phytoplankton and the filter-feeding invertebrates Eurytemora affinis, Balanus improvises and Crassostrea-virginica. Marine Biology. 1989; 103(3): 319–25.
  15. Cullen W.R., Reimer K.J. Arsenic speciation in the environment. Chemical Reviews. 1989; 89(4): 713–64. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00094a002
  16. Francesconi K.A., Edmonds J.S. Arsenic and marine organisms. In: Advances in Inorganic Chemistry. Academic Press Inc: San Diego. 1997; 44: 147–89.
  17. Borak J., Hosgood H.D. Seafood arsenic: implications for human risk assessment. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2007; 47(2): 204–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.09.005
  18. Phillips D.J.H. Arsenic in aquatic organisms — A review, emphasizing chemical speciation. Aquatic Toxicology. 1990; 16(3): 151–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-445X(90)90036-O
  19. European Food Safety Authority, Scientific Opinion on Arsenic in Food. EFSA Journal. 2009; 7(10): 1351.
  20. Kirby J., Maher W. Tissue accumulation and distribution of arsenic compounds in three marine fish species: relationship to trophic position. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2002; 16(2): 108–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.268
  21. Rakitskii V.N., Bondareva L.G., Fedorova N.E., Rodionov A.S. Improvement of the approach in the analytical control of arsenic and its compounds. Approbation on real objects. Khimicheskaya bezopasnost’. 2023; 7(2): 134–52. https://doi.org/10.25514/CHS.2023.2.25008 https://elibrary.ru/gpkavb (in Russian)
  22. USEPA. Assessing human health risks from chemically contaminated, fish and shellfish: A guidance manual. Washington, DC; 1989. Available at: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/2000DGLF.PDF?Dockey=2000DGLF.PDF
  23. Basonov O.A., Sudakova A.V. Chemical composition and nutritional value of meat of different genotypes of sturgeon in industrial production. Vestnik ul’yanovskoi gosudarstvennoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii. 2022; (2): 178–84. https://doi.org/10.18286/1816-4501-2022-2-178-184 https://elibrary.ru/axmfzb (in Russian)
  24. Wirth M., Kirschbaum F., Gessner J., Krüger A., Patriche N., Billard R. Chemical and biochemical composition of caviar from different sturgeon species and origins. Nahrung. 2000; 44(4): 233–7. https://vk.cc/cIL4oN
  25. ATSDR. Toxicological profile for arsenic. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Division of Toxicology. Atlanta, GA; 2007.
  26. Ryabushko V.I., Kozintsev A.F., Toichkin A.M. Concentration of arsenic in the tissues of cultivated mussel Mytilus Galloprovincialis Lam., water and bottom sediments (Crimea, Black sea). Morskoi biologicheskii zhurnal. 2017; 2(3): 68–74. https://doi.org/10.21072/mbj.2017.02.3.06 https://elibrary.ru/zqkywh (in Russian)
  27. Kar S., Maity P.J., Jean J-Sh., Liu Ch.-Ch. et al. Health risks for human intake of aquacultural fish: Arsenic bioaccumulation and contamination. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A. 2011; 46(11): 1266–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2011.598814
  28. Kouassi K.S., Claon S.J., N’Guettia K.R., Laurent S.K., Dakouo G.J., Allico J.D. Distribution and Contamination of Arsenic in Fish, Gastropods and Bivalves in the Aby and Tendo Lagoons in East of Ivory Coast. Journal of Environmental Protection. 2024; 15: 246–64. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2024.153015
  29. Santhana V.K., Raman R.K., Talukder A., Mahanty A., Sarkar D.J., Das B.K., et al. Arsenic Bioaccumulation and Identification of Low-Arsenic-Accumulating Food Fishes for Aquaculture in Arsenic-Contaminated Ponds and Associated Aquatic Ecosystems. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022; 200(6): 2923–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02858-0
  30. Ruangwises N., Saipan P., Ruangwises S. Total and inorganic arsenic in natural and aquacultural freshwater fish in Thailand: a comparative study. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2012; 89(6): 1196–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0858-6
  31. Hoy K.S., Davydiuk T., Chen X., Lau C., Schofield J.R.M., Lu X., et al. Arsenic speciation in freshwater fish: challenges and research needs. Food Qual. Saf. 2023; 7: fyad032. https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyad032
  32. Rumpler A., Edmonds J.S., Katsu M., Jensen K.B., Goessler W., Raber G., et al. Arsenic-containing long-chain fatty acids in cod-liver oil: a result of biosynthetic infidelity? Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2008; 47(14): 2665–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200705405
  33. Taleshi M.S., Jensen K.B., Raber G., Edmonds J.S., Gunnlaugsdottir H., Francesconi K.A. Arsenic-containing hydrocarbons: natural compounds in oil from the fish capelin, Mallotus villosus. Chem. Commun (Camb). 2008; (39): 4706–7. https://doi.org/10.1039/b808049f
  34. Amayo K.O., Raab A., Krupp E.M., Feldmann J. Identification of arsenolipids and their degradation products in cod-liver oil. Talanta. 2014; 118: 217–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.09.056
  35. Bagryantseva O.V., Khotimchenko S.A. Risks associated with the consumption of inorganic and organic arsenic. Voprosy pitaniya. 2021; 90(6): 6–17. https://doi.org/10.33029/0042-8833-2021-90-6-6-17 https://elibrary.ru/nwvhpz (in Russian)
  36. Rodionov A.S., Bondareva L.G., Fedorova N.E. Comparison of the potential risk from arsenic exposure when eating fish grown in natural and artificial conditions, using the example of rainbow trout. Toksikologicheskii vestnik. 2024; 32(5): 307–12. https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2024-32-5-307-312 https://elibrary.ru/nisntc (in Russain)
  37. Bondareva L.G., Rodionov A.S., Sinitskaya T.A., Fedorova N.E. Potential transformations of arsenic forms in fish during cooking processing: a case study of Russian sturgeon. Toksikologicheskii vestnik. 2024; 32(6): 356–62. https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2024-32-6-357-363 https://elibrary.ru/mlkuuj (in Russian)
  38. Maher W., Waring J., Krikowa F., Duncan E., Foster S. 2018. Ecological factors affecting the accumulation and speciation of arsenic in twelve Australian coastal Bivalve molluscs. Environ. Chem. 2018; 15(1): 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN17106
  39. USEPA. Technical Summary of Information. Washington, DC; 2003. Available at: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P1002YTX.PDF?Dockey=P1002YTX.PDF [date of access Dec 9 2024].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ:  ПИ № ФС77-50668 от 13.07.2012 г.