The impact of electronic medical records in the modern primary health care system on the interaction between doctor and patient in Moscow

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

Introduction. Digital technologies are an essential condition for the development of modern health care. New forms of interaction between the supplier and the consumer of medical services determine the need to understand the attitude of the doctor and the patient to this employment operation.

Purpose. Assess the change in the quality of communications between the doctor and the patient with the widespread introduction of electronic medical records. 

Material and methods. Within the framework of the project, a content analysis of media materials was held. Mass (questionnaire) survey of doctors and patients in November–December 2020 was executed. The comprehensive survey had 482 respondents, including 168 doctors and 314 patients.

Results. Most (61.5%) of medical professionals indicate a decrease in time costs during the patient’s reception, an increase in time to work with patients is noted in 47.4% of respondents. 55% of doctors report that the service helps better focus on the provision of medical care, and 47.6% of respondents believe that the conduct of medical documentation in electronic form allows reducing the frequency of passing a significant pathology. Among patients, 52.2% believe that introducing electronic medical records will enable you to increase the time that the doctor pays to the patient during the reception. 68.9% of patients indicate an improvement in the interaction between doctors and patients.

Conclusion. High-quality results can be achieved only if there is a medical staff with the skills of using modern digital technologies and new communication skills with a patient when using electronic medical records.

Sobre autores

Aleksandra Veselkova

National Research University “High School of Economics”

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1135-7430
Rússia

Elena Zvonareva

National Research University “High School of Economics”

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4788-6991
Rússia

Maksim Kornilov

National Research University “High School of Economics”

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2743-199X
Rússia

Vasilii Ushenin

National Research University “High School of Economics”

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1800-4195
Rússia

Ekaterina Kornilova

Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: ekaterinakornilova2017@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7214-4340

MD, PhD, Leading Researcher, Research Institute of Health Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, 115184, Russian Federation.

e-mail: ekaterinakornilova2017@gmail.com

Rússia

Malvina Hołownia-Voloskova

Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2437-298X
Polônia

Bibliografia

  1. Van der Kleij R.M.J.J., Kasteleyn M.J., Meijer E., Bonten T.N., Houwink E.J.F., Teichert M., et al. SERIES: eHealth in primary care. Part 1: Concepts, conditions and challenges. Eur. J. Gen. Pract. 2019; 25(4): 179-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2019.1658190
  2. Alkureishi M.A., Lee W.W., Lyons M., Press V.G., Imam S., Nkansah-Amankra A., et al. Impact of electronic medical record use on the patient-doctor relationship and communication: a systematic review. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2016; 31(5): 548-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3582-1
  3. Halbesleben J.R.B., Rathert C. Linking physician burnout and patient outcomes: exploring the dyadic relationship between physicians and patients. Health Care Manage. Rev. 2008; 33(1): 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HMR.0000304493.87898.72
  4. Maly R.C., Stain J.A., Umezawa Y., Leake B., Anglin M.D. Racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer outcomes among older patients: effects of physician communication and patient empowerment. Health Psychol. 2008; 27(6): 728. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.6.728
  5. Safran D. G., Taira D.A., Rogers W.H., Kosinski M., Ware J.E., Tarlov A.R. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J. Fam. Pract. 1998; 47(3): 213-20.
  6. Chen J.Y., Tao M.L., Tisando D., Malin J., Ko C., Timmer M., et al. Impact of physician-patient discussions on patient satisfaction. Med. Care. 2008; 46(11): 1157-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817924bc
  7. Keating N.L., Green D.C., Kao A.C., Gazmararian J.A., Wu V.Y., Cleary P.D. How are patients’ specific ambulatory care experiences related to trust, satisfaction, and considering changing physicians? J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2002; 17(1): 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10209.x
  8. Waljee J. F., Hu E.S., Newman L.A., Alderman A.K. Correlates of patient satisfaction and provider trust after breast conserving surgery. Cancer. 2008; 112(8): 1679-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23351
  9. Hsu J., Huang J., Fung V., Robertson N., Jimison H., Frankel R. Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005; 12(4): 474-80. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1741
  10. Doyle R.J., Wang N., Anthony D., Borkan J., Shield R.R., Goldman R.E. Computers in the examination room and the electronic health record: physicians’ perceived impact on clinical encounters before and after full installation and implementation. Fam. Pract. 2012; 29(5): 601-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cms015
  11. Ventres W., Kooienga S., Marlin R., Vickovic N., Stewart V. Clinician style and examination room computers: a video ethnography. Fam. Med. 2005; 37(4): 276-81.
  12. Ventres W., Kooienga S., Vuckovic N., Marlin R., Nygren P., Stewart V. Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann. Fam. Med. 2006; 4(2): 124-31. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.425
  13. Greatbatch D., Heath C., Campion P., Luff P. How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction. Fam. Pract. 1995; 12(1): 32-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/12.1.32
  14. Booth N., Robinson P. Interference with the patient-doctor relationship - the cultural gap? Lessons from observation. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2002; 87: 6-9.
  15. Gibbings-Isaac D., Iqbal M., Tahir M.A., Kumarapeli P., de Lusignan S. The pattern of silent time in the clinical consultation: an observational multichannel video study. Fam. Pract. 2012; 29(5): 616-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cms001
  16. Als A.B. The desk-top computer as a magic box: patterns of behaviour connected with the desk-top computer; GPs’ and patients’ perceptions. Fam. Pract. 1997; 14(1): 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/14.1.17
  17. Shachak A., Hadas-Dayagi M., Ziv A., Reis S. Primary care physicians’ use of an electronic medical record system: a cognitive task analysis. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2009; 24(3): 341-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0892-6
  18. Montague E., Asan O. Considering social ergonomics: the effects of HIT on interpersonal relationships between patients and clinicians. Work. 2012; 41(Suppl. 1): 4479-83. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0748-4479
  19. Booth A., LeCouteur A., Chur-Hansen A. The impact of the desktop computer on rheumatologist-patient consultations. Clin. Rheumatol. 2013; 32(3): 391-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-012-2140-z
  20. Dowell A., Stubbe M., Scott-Dowell K., Macdonald L., Dew K. Talking with the alien: interaction with computers in the GP consultation. Aust. J. Prim. Health. 2013; 19(4): 275-82. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY13036
  21. Margalit R.S., Roter D., Dunevant A., Larson S., Reis S. Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: An observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Educ. Couns. 2006; 61(1): 134-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.03.004
  22. Fiks A.G., Alessandrini E.A., Forrest C.B., Khan S., Localio A.R., Gerber A. Electronic medical record use in pediatric primary care. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2011; 18(1): 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.004135
  23. Booth N., Robinson P., Kohannejad J. Identification of high-quality consultation practice in primary care: the effects of computer use on doctor-patient rapport. Inform. Prim. Care. 2004; 12(2): 75-83. https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v12i2.111
  24. McGrath J.M., Arar N.H., Pugh J.A. The influence of electronic medical record usage on nonverbal communication in the medical interview. Health Informatics J. 2007; 13(2): 105-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458207076466
  25. Saleem J.J., Flanagan M.E., Russ A.L., McMullen C.K., Elli L., Russell S.A., et al. You and me and the computer makes three: variations in exam room use of the electronic health record. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2014; 21(e1): 147-51. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002189

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Veselkova A.Y., Zvonareva E.S., Kornilov M.N., Ushenin V.V., Kornilova E.B., Hołownia-Voloskova M.E., 2021

Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ:  ПИ № ФС77-50668 от 13.07.2012 г.